When Should Preventive Treatment Be Paid for by Health Insurance?
- 13 October 1994
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 331 (15) , 1027-1030
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199410133311521
Abstract
In the national debate about who should have health insurance, surprisingly little attention has been focused on what medical services health insurance itself should cover. Historically, discussions of this topic have centered on concepts such as basic health care or medically necessary care.1 When the power of medical diagnosis and treatment was limited, these terms had boundaries as well. As physicians' diagnostic prowess has increased, however, especially in the area of genetics, such terms have become open-ended. To avoid predictable conflicts over benefit coverage, much more precise definitions will be required, so that patients and health care providers can understand . . .Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' rights after health care reform: who decides what is medically necessary?American Journal of Public Health, 1994
- Variation in Approval by Insurance Companies of Coverage for Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Court-ordered reimbursement for unproven medical technology. Circumventing technology assessmentPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Inherited breast and ovarian cancer. What are the risks? What are the choices?Published by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1993
- Genetic counseling for families with inherited susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancerJAMA, 1993
- Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescuePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- What care is 'essential'? What services are 'basic'?JAMA, 1991
- What should count as basic health care?Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 1983