The effect of dose and time on the induction of genetic alterations insaccharomyces cerevisiae by aminoacridines in the presence and absence of visible light irradiation in comparison with the dose-effect-curves of mutagens with other type of action

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Aminoacridines induce frameshift mutations and are photodynamically active, depending on whether visible light is absent or present. Therefore, a test system which allows to compare quantitatively the genetic effects of aminoacridines irradiated or unirradiated by visible light ought to be susceptible to the different DNA alterations which can be induced by these substances. For this reason in most experiments mitotic gene conversion and only in some selected experiments reverse mutation was chosen as the indicator of genetic activity. In contrast to mutation systems mitotic gene conversion has never shown a response specific to only some types of mutagens. The three aminoacridine derivatives used-acridine orange (AO), proflavine (PF), and acridine yellow (AY)—were successful in the induction of convertants at two different loci. No locus-specificity could be observed. The time-dependent induction of convertants proceeds quickly but soon reaches—especially after treatment without light—a saturation point. The dose/effect-curve after treatment in the dark has a slope increasing with increasing concentration. Irradiation with visible light results in a dose/effect-curve consisting of three parts. At first the increase of convertants is nearly linear extending one (AY) to three (AO) orders of magnitude. After that a saturation effect begins at the point at which an effectiveness of the acridines in the dark is apparent. At high concentrations an induction of convertants can again be observed which is nearly the same as that after treatment in the dark. To determine whether the dose/effect-curves obtained for gene conversion refer to similar curves for gene mutations after treatment with AO at the same locus not only gene conversions but also reverse mutations were scored for. AO-treatment in the dark is ineffective in inducing reverse mutations. Irradiation with visible light results in a dose/effect-curve beeing parallel only in its first part to the dose/effect-curve obtained for gene conversion, while in its second part a mutation frequency decline can be observed. Comparing the dose/effect-curves of AO resulting from the induction of gene conversion and gene mutation, and taking into account that no mutants can be induced by AO-treatment in the dark, the increase in convertants at high acridine-concentrations can be explained as an addition of light-dependent and light-independent effects. That means, in mutation systems at low concentrations of aminoacridines irradiation with visible light should cause transitions, transversions and microlesions, at intermediate concentrations frameshift lesions should begin to appear, and at very high concentrations nearly exclusively frameshift lesions should occur. The dose/effect-curves of aminoacridines compared with those of other mutagens are very complex. The dose/effect-curves of the mutagens of other type of action tested are linear in a double logarithmic scale, and parallel for induced gene conversion and induced gene mutation. These results indicate that the gene conversion ability of a given compound depends on its mutagenic property. That means, many mutagens may exert specific genetic effects not directly but mainly in indirect ways by leading to DNA damage, a situation for repair synthesis resulting as well in mutations as recombinations.