On Scaling Models Applied to Data from Several Groups
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Psychometrika
- Vol. 51 (1) , 123-135
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294005
Abstract
Statistical methods are presented to facilitate a more complete analysis of results obtained when a scaling model is applied to data from two or more groups. These methods can be used to (a) compare the corresponding estimated latent distributions obtained using the scaling model applied to the different groups, (b) compare the corresponding estimated item reliabilities (or item response error rates) for the different groups, and (c) test whether the scaling model applied to the several groups can be replaced by a more parsimonious scaling model that includes various homogeneity constraints (i.e., constraints that describe which parameters in the model are the same for the several groups). Various kinds of scaling models are considered here in the multiple-group context.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Latent Structure Analysis of a Set of Multidimensional Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1984
- Analyzing sequential categorical data on dyadic interaction: A latent structure approach.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- A Scaling Model with Response Errors and Intrinsically Unscalable RespondentsPsychometrika, 1980
- Comparing Latent DistributionsPsychometrika, 1980
- A Maximum Likelihood Approach to the “Test of Inclusion”Psychometrika, 1979
- A Probabilistic Model for Validation of Behavioral HierarchiesPsychometrika, 1976
- A New Model for Scaling Response Patterns: An Application of the Quasi-Independence ConceptJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1975
- Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable modelsBiometrika, 1974
- A probabilistic formulation and statistical analysis of guttman scalingPsychometrika, 1970
- An Empirical Comparison of Restricted and General Latent Distance AnalysisPsychometrika, 1954