A FIELD STUDY OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSE: RESEARCH‐ VERSUS ADMINISTRATIVE‐ BASED RATINGS
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Personnel Psychology
- Vol. 48 (1) , 151-160
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01751.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994
- Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1993
- THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL SELECTION OF APPARENT DECLINES IN PREDICTIVE VALIDITIES OVER TIME: A CRITIQUE OF HULIN, HENRY, AND NOONPersonnel Psychology, 1992
- Use of verbal protocols to trace cognitions associated with self- and supervisor evaluations of performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Accountability forces in performance appraisalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1990
- Interrater reliability of job performance ratings: Growth to asymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990
- PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND TERMINATIONS: A REVIEW OF COURT DECISIONS SINCE BRITO V. ZIA WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR PERSONNEL PRACTICESPersonnel Psychology, 1987
- The role of appraisal purpose: Effects of purpose on information acquisition and utilizationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositionsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984
- Validity of peer nominations in predicting a distant performance criterion.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1965