Preparation and Crystal Chemistry of Divalent Europium Compounds

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The discovery that the europium chalcogenides are a particularly simple and important group of magnetic materials has resulted in considerable work being done on the synthesis of these materials. Several methods of preparing pure EuO have been investigated and the results are reported. The method which resulted in the best EuO is when an excess of europium metal is reacted with Eu2O3 at 800°C and then distilled off at 1150° in a high vacuum. Chemical analyses, microstructures, and magnetization measurements were used to determine the stoichiometry of EuO as a function of temperature. The results indicated that the rock salt phase can accommodate about 4 mole% trivalent europium in solid solution at 1300°C. Very little (2SiO4 and Eu3SiO5, the aluminates Eu3Al2O6 and Eu5Al2O8, and the phosphate Eu3(PO4)2. Other divalent europium compounds in which the europium concentration is lower but which had simple well‐known crystal structures were also investigated. These included EuTiO3, EuZrO3, and CsEuF3 with the perovskite structure, EuF2 with the fluorite, EuWO4 with the scheelite, Eu2CaWO6 and Eu2SrWO6 with the cryolite, and Eu2ZrO4 with the K2NiF4 structures. None of these compounds were shown to be ferromagnetic despite the fact that the nearest‐neighbor Eu—Eu distances were less than 4.5 Å, the distance determined from the chalcogenide series to be the critical one for a positive ferromagnetic Eu—Eu interaction. The absence of ferromagnetism in these compounds is discussed in relation to the fact that, except in CsEuF3, the co‐ordination number of the Eu+2 ion is not six as it is in the chalcogenides. The assumption that the ferromagnetic interaction takes place via overlap of 5d orbitals is considered and discussed in relation to their structures.

This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit: