ON THE EFFECTS OF COMPONENT DURATIONS AND COMPONENT REINFORCEMENT RATES IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES
- 1 May 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 37 (3) , 417-439
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-417
Abstract
Four experiments, each using the same six pigeons, investigated the effects of varying component durations and component reinforcement rates in multiple variable‐interval schedules. Experiment 1 used unequal component durations in which one component was five times the duration of the other, and the shorter component was varied over conditions from 120 seconds to 5 seconds. The schedules were varied over five values for each pair of component durations. Sensitivity to reinforcement rate changes was the same at all component durations. In Experiment 2, both component durations were 5 seconds, and the schedules were again varied using both one and two response keys. Sensitivity to reinforcement was not different from the values found in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, various manipulations, including body‐weight changes, reinforcer duration changes, blackouts, hopper lights correlated with keylights, and overall reinforcement rate changes were carried out. No reliable increase in reinforcement sensitivity resulted from any manipulation. Finally, in Experiment 4, reinforcement rates in the two components were kept constant and unequal, and the component durations were varied. Shorter components produced significantly increased response rates normally in the higher reinforcement rate component, but schedule reversals at short component durations eliminated the response rate increases. The effects of component duration on multiple schedule performance cannot be interpreted as changing sensitivity to reinforcement nor to changing bias.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- MULTIPLE SCHEDULE COMPONENT DURATION: A RE‐ANALYSIS OF SHIMP AND WHEATLEY (1971) AND TODOROV (1972)Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978
- MULTIPLE AND CONCURRENT SCHEDULE PERFORMANCE: INDEPENDENCE FROM CONCURRENT AND SUCCESSIVE SCHEDULE CONTEXTSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1977
- PERFORMANCE IN CONCURRENT INTERVAL SCHEDULES: A SYSTEMATIC REPLICATION1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1975
- ON TWO TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM THE MATCHING LAW: BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- HUNGER AND CONTRAST IN A MULTIPLE SCHEDULE1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- A YOKED‐CHAMBER COMPARISON OF CONCURRENT AND MULTIPLE SCHEDULESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- ON THE LAW OF EFFECT1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970
- MULTIPLE SCHEDULES: EFFECTS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF REINFORCEMENTS BETWEEN COMPONENTS ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES BETWEEN COMPONENTS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968
- Nonparametric Trend AnalysisPublished by JSTOR ,1965