A Two Micron All‐Sky Survey View of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy. IV. Modeling the Sagittarius Tidal Tails
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 619 (2) , 807-823
- https://doi.org/10.1086/426779
Abstract
M giants recovered from the Two Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) have recently been used to map the position and velocity distributions of tidal debris from the Sagittarius (Sgr) dwarf spheroidal galaxy entirely around the Galaxy. We compare this data set to both test particle orbits and N-body simulations of satellite destruction run within a variety of rigid Milky Way potentials and find that the mass of the Milky Way within 50 kpc of its center should be 3.8-5.6 x 10^11 Msun in order for any Sgr orbit to simultaneously fit the velocity gradient in the Sgr trailing debris and the apocenter of the Sgr leading debris. Orbital pole precession of young debris and leading debris velocities in regions corresponding to older debris provide contradictory evidence in favor of oblate/prolate Galactic halo potentials respectively, leading us to conclude that the orbit of Sgr has evolved over the past few Gyr. Based upon the velocity dispersion and width along the trailing tidal stream we estimate the current bound mass of Sgr to be M_Sgr = 2 - 5 x 10^8 Msun independant of the form of the Galactic potential; this corresponds to a range of mass to light ratios (M/L)_Sgr = 14 - 36 (M/L)_Sun for the Sgr core. Models with masses in this range best fit the apocenter of leading Sgr tidal debris when they orbit with a radial period of roughly 0.85 Gyr and have periGalactica and apoGalactica of about 15 kpc and 60 kpc respectively. These distances will scale with the assumed distance to the Sgr dwarf and the assumed depth of the Galactic potential. The density distribution of debris along the orbit in these models is consistent with the M giant observations, and debris at all orbital phases where M giants are obviously present is younger (i.e. was lost more recently from the satellite) than the typical age of a Sgr M giant star.Comment: 42 pages, 13 figures; Accepted for publication by ApJ (October 08, 2004; originally submitted May 10, 2004). Fixed typos and added references. PDF file with high resolution figures may be downloaded from http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~drlaw/Papers/Sgr_paper4.pdKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Velocity Trends in the Debris of Sagittarius and the Shape of the Dark Matter Halo of Our GalaxyThe Astrophysical Journal, 2004
- The Power Spectrum Dependence of Dark Matter Halo ConcentrationsThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- Simple dynamical models of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2001
- Great Circle Tidal Streams: Evidence for a Nearly Spherical Massive Dark Halo around the Milky WayThe Astrophysical Journal, 2001
- Building up the stellar halo of the GalaxyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1999
- Galactic Indigestion: Numerical Simulations of the Milky Way's Closest NeighborThe Astrophysical Journal, 1998
- Computer models of the Sagittarius dwarf interaction with the Milky WayMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1997
- Sagittarius: the nearest dwarf galaxyMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1995
- A dwarf satellite galaxy in SagittariusNature, 1994
- A self-consistent field method for galactic dynamicsThe Astrophysical Journal, 1992