Is routine induction of labour at term ever justified?
- 27 March 1993
- Vol. 306 (6881) , 840-841
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6881.840
Abstract
Balancing the risks of prolonged gestation against those of induced labour is difficult. Risks to the fetus increase slightly after 42 weeks' gestation but women having labour induced are more likely to have instrumental deliveries or babies with low Apgar scores. Since many women are now expressing a preference for minimal interference in childbirth the most acceptable management of post-term pregnancy seems to be increased fetal surveillance. Each case needs to be considered individually and it is important that the woman is involved in the decision to induce.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Induction of Labor as Compared with Serial Antenatal Monitoring in Post-Term PregnancyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Gestational age and obstetric performance.1992
- Effect of gestational age on obstetric performance: when is "term" over?The Lancet, 1991
- A Comparison of Doppler Flow Velocity Waveforms, Amniotic Fluid Columns, and the Nonstress Test as a Means of Monitoring Post-Dates PregnanciesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1991
- STRIPPING MEMBRANES AT TERM - CAN IT SAFELY REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF POSTTERM PREGNANCIES1990
- Comparison of Induced Versus Non‐Induced Labor in Post‐Term Pregnancy: A Randomized Prospective StudyActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1989
- Obstetric consequences of postmaturityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Unanswered questions on neural tube defects.BMJ, 1987
- Prolonged pregnancy: the management debate.BMJ, 1986
- Prolonged pregnancy: is induction of labour indicated?BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982