The Case Identification Challenge in Measuring Quality of Cancer Care
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (21) , 4353-4360
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.05.527
Abstract
PURPOSE: The delivery of quality care to all patients with cancer has been named as a national priority within the American health care system. This article addresses the issues critical to case identification in cancer quality measurement and recommends possible strategies for accurately identifying a population of cancer patients. METHODS: We present the measurement issues associated with the basic challenges of case identification strategies for quality measurement. We discuss two basic challenges: (1) accurately identifying all patients with the defining characteristics (eg, a diagnosis of breast cancer), and (2) identifying only patients with these characteristics. RESULTS: Possible options for identifying newly diagnosed patients include using claims or other administrative data, cancer registries, cancer registry rapid case ascertainment, pathology laboratories, and physicians’ offices. In the published literature, the sensitivity of claims varies from 75% to 95%, whereas central registries must have a 90% completeness rate to be certified. Most of these approaches, however, involve limitations to obtaining valid and comparable data across multiple settings. CONCLUSION: Using an existing data collection system staffed by skilled data collectors and managers should result in substantially more accurate and timely data. Registry officials and the government agencies that provide their support should be encouraged to adopt quality-of-care analyses as an important purpose of the registry system and to enhance their capacity to rapidly ascertain cases, collect the appropriate identifying information needed for patient contact, and verify stage at diagnosis. In order to meet the growing demand for timely, accurate information about quality of care, registries are likely to require additional support so they can enhance their capacity to rapidly ascertain cases, collect the appropriate identifying information needed for patient contact, and verify stage at diagnosis.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Purchasing oncology servicesCancer, 2000
- The quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinomaCancer, 1998
- Breast Cancer Survival and Treatment in Health Maintenance Organization and Fee-for-Service SettingsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1997
- Age-related patterns of care: evidence against ageism in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Measuring standards of care for early breast cancer in an insured population.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Dissemination of Clinical ResultsMedical Care, 1996
- Factors Associated With Surgical and Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer in Older WomenJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderlyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1996
- Geographic Variation in the Treatment of Localized Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Promoting Quality through Evaluating the Process of Patient CareMedical Care, 1968