Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril on intima–media thickness in previously untreated, elderly hypertensive patients (the ELVERA trial)
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Hypertension
- Vol. 22 (7) , 1309-1316
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hjh.0000125412.50839.b5
Abstract
To compare the effects of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine and the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on intima–media thickness (IMT) in elderly, previously untreated hypertensive individuals. A double-blind randomized parallel-group trial (the ELVERA trial). The study population comprised 166 newly diagnosed hypertensive individuals (aged 60–75 years) with diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 115 mmHg or systolic blood pressure between 160 and 220 mmHg, or both. Patients were allocated randomly to groups to receive amlodipine 5–10 mg or lisinopril 10–20 mg for 2 years. Before and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, IMT was measured in three carotid and two femoral arterial sites by B-mode ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline of the combined mean maximum far wall IMT of carotid and femoral arteries, evaluated by repeated measurement analysis of the treatment effect in an intention-to-treat analysis. After 2 years of treatment, amlodipine decreased IMT by 0.089 mm [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.144 to 0.037]. Lisinopril decreased IMT by 0.065 mm (95% CI 0.124 to 0.010). No differences between the two drugs were found (P = 0.18). Both treatment regimens achieved the greatest reduction of IMT after 1 year, with a slight increase after the second year, whereas the reduction in blood pressure was maintained. Comparing the carotid and femoral arteries, a significant treatment difference in the change from baseline in favour of amlodipine was observed in the IMT of the elastic common carotid artery (P 0.05). The effects of the two drugs on the muscular common femoral artery were not different. In a long-term study, amlodipine and lisinopril reduce IMT to a similar extent in newly diagnosed elderly hypertensive patients. It is suggested that the two drugs have different effects on arteries that are not prone to atherosclerosis.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strong and Significant Relationships Between Aggregation of Major Coronary Risk Factors and the Acceleration of Carotid Atherosclerosis in the General Population of a Japanese CityArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Carotid-Artery Intima and Media Thickness as a Risk Factor for Myocardial Infarction and Stroke in Older AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Risk factors associated with alterations in carotid intima—media thickness in hypertensionJournal Of Hypertension, 1998
- Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertensionThe Lancet, 1997
- Left, Right, Near or Far Wall Common Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Measurements: Associations with Cardiovascular Disease and Lower Extremity Arterial AtherosclerosisJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Kuopio Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (KAPS)Circulation, 1995
- Vascular complications in hypertension: The VHAS studyCardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, 1995
- Arterial Wall Thickness Is Associated With Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease in Middle-Aged AdultsStroke, 1995
- Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart diseaseBritish Medical Bulletin, 1994
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 2, short-term reductions in blood pressure: overview of randomised drug trials in their epidemiological contextPublished by Elsevier ,1990