Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 91 (1) , 240-259
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.240
Abstract
Proponents of the Bayh-Dole Act argue that industrial use of federally funded research would be reduced without university patent licensing. Our survey of U.S. universities supports this view, emphasizing the embryonic state of most technologies licensed and the need for inventor cooperation in commercialization. Thus, for most university inventions, there is a moral-hazard problem with inventor effort. For such inventions, development does not occur unless the inventor's income is tied to the licensee's output by payments such as royalties or equity. Sponsored research from the licensee cannot by itself solve this problem. (JEL O31, O34, O38)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh–Dole act of 1980Research Policy, 2001
- Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly modelEconomics Letters, 1998
- Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965–1988The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- The role of information in licensing contract designResearch Policy, 1996
- Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations: Sources, Characteristics, and FinancingThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1995
- Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent CitationsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1993
- Fundamental Stocks of Knowledge and Productivity GrowthJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- Technology Transfer under Asymmetric InformationThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1990
- THE IMPERFECT MARKET FOR TECHNOLOGY LICENSES*Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1983
- The Role of Knowledge in R&D EfficiencyThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1982