Surprise-induced blindness: A stimulus-driven attentional limit to conscious perception.
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1372-1381
- https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020551
Abstract
The cost of attending to a visual event can be the failure to consciously detect other events. This processing limitation is well illustrated by the attentional blink paradigm, in which searching for and attending to a target presented in a rapid serial visual presentation stream of distractors can impair one's ability to detect a second target presented soon thereafter. The attentional blink critically depends on 'top-down' attentional settings, for it does not occur if participants are asked to ignore the first target. Here we show that 'bottom-up' attention can also lead to a profound but ephemeral deficit in conscious perception: Presentation of a novel, unexpected, and task-irrelevant stimulus virtually abolishes conscious detection of a target presented within half a second after the 'Surprise' stimulus, but only for its earliest occurrences (generally 1 to 2 presentations). This powerful but short-lived deficit contrasts with a milder but more enduring form of attentional capture that accompanies singleton presentations in rapid serial visual presentations. We conclude that the capture of stimulus-driven attention alone can limit explicit perception.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (0094992)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH70776)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Capturing focused attentionPerception & Psychophysics, 2006
- Attentional blink and attentional capture: Endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close successionPerception & Psychophysics, 2006
- Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomyTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2006
- Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blinkPerception & Psychophysics, 2004
- The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?Psychological Research, 2004
- Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capturePsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004
- Attentional capture and inattentional blindnessTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000
- A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1995
- Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuationCognition, 1987
- A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory.Psychological Review, 1957