Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized‐clinical trial
Top Cited Papers
- 14 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Vol. 37 (1) , 88-97
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051x.2009.01492.x
Abstract
Background: The aim of this controlled randomized split‐mouth study was to evaluate whether a modified tunnel/connective tissue graft (CTG) technique – enamel matrix derivative (EMD) combination will improve the treatment of multiple class III recession when compared with the same technique alone.Materials and Methods: Twenty healthy subjects with a mean age of 31.7 years, were enrolled for the trial in a university periodontal clinic. Patients with at least three adjacent gingival recessions on both sides of the mouth were treated with a modified tunnel/CTG technique. On the test side, an EMD was used in addition. Clinical parameters were measured at baseline, 28 days, 3, 6 and 12 months after the surgery. Results are presented at the subject level.Results: The mean root coverage from baseline to 1 year post‐surgery was 82% for the test group and 83% for the control group. Complete root coverage was achieved at 1 year in eight (38%) of the 20 surgeries (experimental and control group).Conclusions: One‐year results indicate that the modified tunnel/CTG technique is predictable for the treatment of multiple class III recession‐type defects. The addition of EMD does not enhance the mean clinical outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?Journal of Dentistry, 2008
- Changes in Gingival Dimensions Following Connective Tissue Grafts for Root Coverage: Comparison of Two ProceduresThe Journal of Periodontology, 2008
- Tunnel Technique With a Surgical Maneuver to Increase the Graft Extension: Case Report With a 3‐Year Follow‐UpThe Journal of Periodontology, 2008
- Coronally advanced flap with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a 2‐year studyJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2005
- A Comparative Study of Coronally Advanced Flaps With and Without the Addition of Enamel Matrix Derivative in the Treatment of Marginal Tissue RecessionThe Journal of Periodontology, 2004
- Efficacy of Chemical Root Surface Modifiers in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease. A Systematic ReviewAnnals of Periodontology, 2003
- Histological Evaluation of 4 Cases of Root Coverage Following a Connective Tissue Graft Combined With an Enamel Matrix Derivative PreparationThe Journal of Periodontology, 2002
- Comparison of Enamel Matrix Proteins and Bioabsorbable Membranes in the Treatment of Intrabony Periodontal Defects. A Split‐Mouth StudyThe Journal of Periodontology, 1999
- The Origin of Granulation Tissue and Its Impact on Postoperative Results of Mucogingival SurgeryThe Journal of Periodontology, 1975
- The Plaque Control RecordThe Journal of Periodontology, 1972