Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in jpme
- Vol. 15 (6) , 531-543
- https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1987.15.6.531
Abstract
The experience of mature, singleton, vaginal breech delivery over the last decade in our hospital is reviewed. This constitutes the largest series of breech delivery reported for over twelve years. Unlike all but two previous reports, we analyze our results by management policy; elective cesarean section, trial of vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section as soon as the diagnosis of breech delivery was made on labor (''expedite'' cesarean operations). Six intrapartum or neonatal deaths occurred among 613 patients selected for trial of vaginal delivery.sbd.a rate of one per cent. There were none following 217 elective or 69 expedite cesarean sections. A detailed review of the literature over the last decade confirms that trial of vaginal delivery is more dangerous to the fetus and results in about one perinatal death of a normally formed infant in 200 deliveries. Apgar scores were slightly lower following trial of vaginal delivery and there were more irritable or injured babies in this group. The last intrapartum or neonatal death occurred in 1981. However, the elective cesarean section rate has increased from 14 to 33 percent over this time period. Similarly the rate of failed trial of vaginal breech delivery has increased from 15 to 31 percent. The proportion of failed trials was highest where the fetus was large but clinicians were poor at estimating fetal weight. Decision theory is used to examine the maternal utility of trial of vaginal breech delivery versus elective cesarean section when the intrapartum cesarean rate rises to these levels. It is shown that, from the point of view of maternal mortality and morbidity in the current pregnancy, trial of vaginal delivery maybe the more dangerous maternal option. Thus a low threshold for cesarean section in labor leads to greater fetal safety at the mother''s expense. It is nevertheless concluded that maternal attitude and the long-term effects of a uterine scar should be considered in the final decision.This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is term breech presentation in primigravida an absolute indication for cesarean section?European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1984
- Randomized management of the nonfrank breech presentation at term: A preliminary reportAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1983
- Singleton breech presentation in labor: Experience in 1980American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: A study of 208 casesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- Breech delivery: Evaluation of the method of delivery on perinatal results and maternal morbidityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1979
- EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA—THE PREFERRED METHOD OF ANALGESIA FOR VAGINAL BREECH DELIVERYBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1978
- Breech presentation at termAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1978
- A six-year prospective study of term breech deliveries utilizing the Zatuchni-Andros Prognostic Scoring IndexAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1975
- AN APPRAISAL OF LUMBAR EPIDURAL BLOCKADE IN PATIENTS WITH A SINGLETON FETUS PRESENTING BY THE BREECHBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1974
- LUMBAR EPIDURAL BLOCK AND THE BREECH PRESENTATIONBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1974