Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department: Initial Results of the ProSCED Registry
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 14 (1) , 41-46
- https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.023
Abstract
Objectives Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) has been well profiled in experimental studies in university emergency departments. Extrapolation of these practices into the community hospital setting is not well established. This report describes community hospital practices and outcomes in a multicenter PSA registry. Methods The Procedural Sedation in the Community Emergency Department (ProSCED) registry is a prospective observational database composed of consecutive emergency physician–directed procedural sedation cases in community hospitals. Registered procedures described by 15 categorical data fields are collected at the time of the patient encounter and entered into a secure Internet‐housed database. Results A total of 1,028 procedural sedations were performed on 980 patients at 14 study sites. The most common specified procedures performed included shoulder relocation (392), hip relocation (102), elbow relocation (70), upper extremity fracture care (69), lower extremity fracture care (66), and facial laceration repair (67). Complications of any description occurred in 42 cases (4.1%), with no patient's disposition changed secondary to a complication. Patients' ages ranged from 1 month to 95 years, with a median age of 31 years. Of procedures attempted, 982 (95.5%) were successfully completed, 21 cases (2.0%) were adequately sedated but unable to have their procedure completed, and 21 cases (2.0%) were believed to be inadequately sedated. Medication use included midazolam in 423 cases (41.1%), propofol in 253 (24.6%), fentanyl in 253 (24.6%), etomidate in 241 (23.4%), and ketamine in 145 (14.1%), as well as several others. Cases using either ketamine or propofol exhibited the fewest complications, while those using fentanyl, hydromorphone, or midazolam demonstrated the highest complication rates. Conclusions Community emergency physicians deliver safe and effective PSA over a wide variety of ages and procedures while using a broad selection of agents.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Propofol for Emergency Department Procedural Sedation and Analgesia: A Tale of Three CentersAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2006
- Procedural Sedation of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Procedural Sedation of Critically Ill Patients in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Clinical policy: Evidence-based approach to pharmacologic agents used in pediatric sedation and analgesia in the emergency department☆☆☆★★★♢Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Propofol sedation by emergency physicians for elective pediatric outpatient proceduresAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Propofol for procedural sedation in children in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Sedation for cardioversion in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Randomized Clinical Trial of Propofol versus Methohexital for Procedural Sedation during Fracture and Dislocation Reduction in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Risk stratification and safe administration of propofol by registered nurses supervised by the gastroenterologist: A prospective observational study of more than 2000 casesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2003
- Clinical Policy for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in the Emergency DepartmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1998