Types of linguistic knowledge: interpreting and producing compound nouns
- 17 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Child Language
- Vol. 14 (3) , 547-567
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s030500090001028x
Abstract
The present study examined the types of linguistic knowledge that affect children's ability to understand and produce novel compounds in Hebrew. Sixty children aged 3;0–9;0, and 12 adults, were asked to interpret and to produce novel Noun + Noun compounds. Their comprehension was in advance of their production. In comprehension, morphological form of head nouns had little effect: from age four, children did equally well on all the compound forms tested; they identified head nouns and also possible relations between heads and their modifiers. In production, though, knowledge of morphological form was crucial. The fewer the changes children had to make in the forms of head nouns, the earlier they mastered that compound pattern. Finally, children who produced novel compounds correctly were also able to interpret novel compounds, but not vice versa.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coining complex compounds in English: affixes and word order in acquisitionLinguistics, 1986
- The Process of Language UnderstandingLanguage, 1985
- The acquisition of Hebrew plurals: the case of the missing gender categoryJournal of Child Language, 1983
- Comprehension, Production, and Language AcquisitionAnnual Review of Psychology, 1983
- Modern Hebrew StructureLanguage, 1982
- Verb-pattern alternation: the interface of morphology, syntax, and semantics in Hebrew child languageJournal of Child Language, 1982
- DIE INTROFLEXIVE WORTBILDUNG IM HEBRÄISCHENFolia Linguistica, 1982
- More about the same: children's understanding of post-articlesJournal of Child Language, 1977
- English Pluralization Rules of Six-Year-Old ChildrenChild Development, 1967
- Die Kindersprache: Eine psychologische und sprachtheoretische UntersuchungThe American Journal of Psychology, 1928