How Does The Quality Of Care Compare In Five Countries?
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 23 (3) , 89-99
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.23.3.89
Abstract
International data on quality of medical care allow countries to compare their performance to that of other countries. The Commonwealth Fund International Working Group on Quality Indicators collected data on twenty-one indicators that reflect medical care in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, England, and the United States. The indicators include five-year cancer relative survival rates, thirty-day case-fatality rates after acute myocardial infarction and stroke, breast cancer screening rates, and asthma mortality rates. No country scores consistently the best or worst overall. Each country has at least one area of care where it could learn from international experiences and one area where its experiences could teach others.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2003
- Evidence-based policy recommendations on cancer screening and preventionCancer Detection Prevention, 2002
- Avoidable Mortality in the United States and Canada, 1980–1996American Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Inequities In Health Care: A Five-Country SurveyHealth Affairs, 2002
- A User’s Manual For The IOM’s ‘Quality Chasm’ ReportHealth Affairs, 2002
- Toward a comparison of survival in American and European cancer patientsCancer, 2000
- Are Increasing 5-Year Survival Rates Evidence of Success Against Cancer?JAMA, 2000
- Smoking cessation: evidence based recommendations for the healthcare systemBMJ, 1999
- End of the New Zealand asthma mortality epidemicThe Lancet, 1995