Evaluation of Polyp Detection in Relation to Procedure Time of Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopy
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 99 (10) , 1941-1945
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40569.x
Abstract
Multiple factors influence the yield of colonoscopy for the detection of neoplasia. Few studies have addressed the impact of colonoscopy duration on procedure yield. The aim of our study was to determine whether endoscopist-specific procedure times correlate with the number and clinical significance of polyps detected at screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Procedural data from screening or surveillance colonoscopies performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, between January 1, 1996 and June 30, 2000, were reviewed. Individual endoscopists were characterized by their personal endoscopist procedure mean time (EPMT) to perform a negative colonoscopy. Procedure time included patient's consent and sedation. EPMT was then correlated with individual polyp detection rates. Overall, 10,159 colonoscopies were reviewed of which 4,312 (42.4%) yielded polyps. Polyp detection varied among endoscopists between 19.0% and 62.3%. There was a close correlation between EPMT and polyp yield (all sizes), r = 0.64, although correlation was weaker for polyps >10 mm (r = 0.42) and polyps >20 mm (r = 0.20). On multivariate analysis, longer mean endoscopist time was associated with colonic lesion detection, OR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.37-1.62). Longer mean procedure duration demonstrated a looser association with identification of polyps >10 mm, OR = 1.40 (1.19-1.64) and polyps >20 mm, OR = 1.03 (0.74-1.43). There is a direct correlation between colonoscopy procedure time and yield, with a three-fold variation of polyp detection rates. These results should prompt future prospective studies assessing the impact of colonoscopic withdrawal time on lesion detection.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002
- Risk of Advanced Proximal Neoplasms in Asymptomatic Adults According to the Distal Colorectal FindingsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Use of Colonoscopy to Screen Asymptomatic Adults for Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss ratesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2000
- Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practiceGastroenterology, 1997
- Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood testThe Lancet, 1996
- Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancerThe Lancet, 1996
- Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult BloodNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colorectal Cancer MortalityJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- A Case–Control Study of Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Mortality from Colorectal CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992