Artemether-Lumefantrine versus Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for Treatment of Malaria: A Randomized Trial
Open Access
- 18 May 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Clinical Trials
- Vol. 2 (5) , e20
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pctr.0020020
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. Randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Apac, Uganda, an area of very high malaria transmission intensity. Children aged 6 mo to 10 y with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Treatment of malaria with AL or DP, each following standard 3-d dosing regimens. Risks of recurrent parasitemia at 28 and 42 d, unadjusted and adjusted by genotyping to distinguish recrudescences and new infections. Of 421 enrolled participants, 417 (99%) completed follow-up. The unadjusted risk of recurrent falciparum parasitemia was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (11% versus 29%; risk difference [RD] 18%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11%–26%) and 42 d (43% versus 53%; RD 9.6%, 95% CI 0%–19%) of follow-up. Similarly, the risk of recurrent parasitemia due to possible recrudescence (adjusted by genotyping) was significantly lower for participants treated with DP than for those treated with AL after 28 d (1.9% versus 8.9%; RD 7.0%, 95% CI 2.5%–12%) and 42 d (6.9% versus 16%; RD 9.5%, 95% CI 2.8%–16%). Patients treated with DP had a lower risk of recurrent parasitemia due to non-falciparum species, development of gametocytemia, and higher mean increase in hemoglobin compared to patients treated with AL. Both drugs were well tolerated; serious adverse events were uncommon and unrelated to study drugs. DP was superior to AL for reducing the risk of recurrent parasitemia and gametocytemia, and provided improved hemoglobin recovery. DP thus appears to be a good alternative to AL as first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Uganda. To maximize the benefit of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Africa, treatment should be integrated with aggressive strategies to reduce malaria transmission intensity. Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN75606663Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artemisinin Combination Therapies for Treatment of Uncomplicated Malaria in UgandaPLoS Clinical Trials, 2006
- Efficacy of Artesunate Plus Amodiaquine versus That of Artemether-Lumefantrine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Childhood Plasmodium falciparum Malaria in Zanzibar, TanzaniaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- A Randomized, Controlled Study of a Simple, Once-Daily Regimen of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated, Multidrug-Resistant Falciparum MalariaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2005
- Amodiaquine alone, amodiaquine+sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, amodiaquine+artesunate, and artemether-lumefantrine for outpatient treatment of malaria in Tanzanian children: a four-arm randomised effectiveness trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Supervised versus unsupervised intake of six-dose artemether-lumefantrine for treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Mbarara, Uganda: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2005
- Randomized, Controlled Dose‐Optimization Studies of Dihydroartemisinin‐Piperaquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Multidrug‐Resistant Falciparum Malaria in ThailandThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Artemether‐lumefantrine for uncomplicated malaria: a systematic reviewTropical Medicine & International Health, 2004
- WHO, the Global Fund, and medical malpractice in malaria treatmentThe Lancet, 2004
- Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine against multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Vietnam: randomised clinical trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Efficacy and Safety of Dihydroartemisinin‐Piperaquine (Artekin) in Cambodian Children and Adults with Uncomplicated Falciparum MalariaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2002