Assessing the Forecasting Performance of Regime‐Switching, ARIMA and GARCH Models of House Prices
- 15 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Real Estate Economics
- Vol. 31 (2) , 223-243
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00064
Abstract
While price changes on any particular home are difficult to predict, aggregate home price changes are forecastable. In this context, this paper compares the forecasting performance of three types of univariate time series models: ARIMA, GARCH and regime‐switching. The underlying intuition behind regime‐switching models is that the series of interest behaves differently depending on the realization of an unobservable regime variable. Regime‐switching models are a compelling choice for real estate markets that have historically displayed boom and bust cycles. However, we find that, while regime‐switching models can perform better in‐sample, simple ARIMA models generally perform better in out‐of‐sample forecasting.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Housing Return and Construction CyclesReal Estate Economics, 2001
- Avoiding the Pitfalls: Can Regime-Switching Tests Reliably Detect Bubbles?Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 1998
- Booms and Busts in the UK Housing MarketThe Economic Journal, 1997
- Booms and Busts in the UK Housing MarketThe Economic Journal, 1997
- Switching error-correction models of house prices in the United KingdomEconomic Modelling, 1997
- Regime-Switching Models: A Guide to the Bank of Canada Gauss ProceduresSSRN Electronic Journal, 1996
- Alternative models for conditional stock volatilityJournal of Econometrics, 1990
- Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 1986
- FHA Terminations: A Prelude to Rational Mortgage PricingReal Estate Economics, 1985
- Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom InflationEconometrica, 1982