How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts?
- 1 May 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 8 (5) , 255-258
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02600092
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigationBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1991
- Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social ResearchPublished by SAGE Publications ,1991
- More Informative Abstracts RevisitedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1990
- Research Policy: Problems with peer review and alternativesBMJ, 1988
- How to Keep Up with the Medical Literature: IV. Using the Literature to Solve Clinical ProblemsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- How to Keep Up with the Medical Literature: II. Deciding Which Journals to Read RegularlyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- How to Keep Up with the Medical Literature: I. Why Try to Keep Up and How to Get StartedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- A bibliography of publications on observer variabilityJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975