On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip
- 10 May 1991
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research
- Vol. 96 (B5) , 8441-8452
- https://doi.org/10.1029/91jb00275
Abstract
We propose a model for earthquake afterslip based on rate and state variable friction laws. In the model, afterslip is attributed to the interaction of a velocity‐weakening region at depth (within which earthquakes nucleate) with an upper region of velocity‐strengthening frictional behavior. The existence of this upper region is supported by independent seismologic observations and the results of laboratory friction experiments. In our model, afterslip is the result of relaxation of a stress perturbation within the velocity‐strengthening region, which arises when an earthquake propagates into that region from below. We derive the stress perturbation and its decay from the friction constitutive law using a simple, 1 degree‐of‐freedom approximation for the elastic interaction between the fault and its surroundings. This approximation is based on thickness‐averaged displacements and slip velocities within the velocity‐strengthening region, which is assumed to slip as a rigid block. Coseismic and postseismic slip are coupled through the thickness‐averaged stiffness k of the velocity‐strengthening region. We assume k to be inversely proportional to the thickness of this region, which means that thicker velocity strengthening regions have a greater tendency to arrest coseismic slip. We model the afterslip‐time histories of the 1966 Parkfield and 1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes and relate the model parameters to physical parameters which may govern the rheologic behavior of the faults. In accord with field observations, our model predicts (1) that afterslip on some faults scales with the thickness of the (unconsolidated) sedimentary cover and (2) that proportionally more afterslip occurs for earthquakes in which coseismic surface slip is small compared with coseismic slip at depth. Velocity‐strengthening frictional behavior is to be expected for faults within poorly consolidated sediments and for those that contain significant gouge zones (about >500 m) within their shallow regions (<3–5 km). Combining our results with those of recent laboratory friction studies indicates that relatively young faults with little accumulated fault gouge should exhibit little afterslip.This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The frictional properties of a simulated gouge having a fractal particle distributionPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Effects of load point velocity on frictional instability behaviorTectonophysics, 1990
- Dynamic stress drop and rupture dynamics of the October 15, 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquakeTectonophysics, 1990
- Santa Cruz mountains (Loma Prieta) earthquakeEos, 1989
- The critical slip distance for seismic faultingNature, 1988
- The depth of seismic faulting and the upper transition from stable to unstable slip regimesGeophysical Research Letters, 1988
- Modelling aftershock migration and afterslip of the San Juan Bautista, California, earthquake of October 3, 1972Tectonophysics, 1987
- Roughness of natural fault surfacesGeophysical Research Letters, 1987
- Empirical law for fault-creep eventsTectonophysics, 1977
- California Earthquakes: Why Only Shallow Focus?Science, 1970