Predictive value of random sample urine bile acids corrected by creatinine in liver disease
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Hepatology
- Vol. 7 (1) , 115-121
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840070123
Abstract
Bile acids, in a random sample of urine, discriminated normal controls from liver disease, with a probability similar to fasting plasma bile acids (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, depending on the analytical technique). A high degree of correlation between urinary and plasma bile acids (up to r = 0.93) was achieved only when the urine flow was corrected by using a urinary bile acids/creatinine ratio but not with urinary bile acids as simple volume concentration. These findings originated from 10 patients with severe liver disease and 10 with mild liver disease, all biopsy-confirmed, compared with controls. In 24 normal controls and 24 histologically confirmed compensated liver disease, the predictive value of urinary bile acids/creatinine equaled or exceeded fasting plasma bile acids and routine liver tests. In a patient recovering from subacute hepatic necrosis, the urinary bile acids/creatinine closely resembled changes in plasma bile acids and in the routine liver tests. When sulfated urinary bile acids were included, the discrimination between liver disease and controls did not improve. Gallbladder contraction induced by parenteral analogs of cholecystokinin did not change urinary bile acids/creatinine, despite a significant increase in the plasma bile acids. Collection of fasting urine is thus not necessary. Urinary bile acids/creatinine in 12 subjects with renal insufficiency and moderate impairment of creatinine clearance was not different from controls. The weight/height index did not affect this urinary test: there was no significant correlation between the two. Available radioimmunoassays for plasma bile acids can be easily adapted for urine. Enzymatic-spectrophotometric assay of bile acids is also useful. Urinary bile acids/creatinine from a random sample of urine provides valuable information not only on the presence of liver disease but also about its extent, making it useful for screening and for a follow-up of liver disease.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Severity of Liver Disease: Twelve Laboratory Tests Evaluated by Multiple RegressionJournal of International Medical Research, 1985
- A Kit For Spectrophotometric Determination of Bile AcidsLaboratory Medicine, 1985
- Biliary and Urinary Excretion of Sulfated, Glucuronidated and Tetrahydroxylated Bile Acids in Cirrhotic PatientsHepatology, 1985
- Use of Single Voided Urine Samples to Estimate Quantitative ProteinuriaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Simple enzymatic detection method for urinary sulfated 7α-hydroxy bile acids in normal subjects and in patients with acute hepatitisJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1983
- Bile acid excretion during drainage of extrahepatic cholestasis with refeeding of bileScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1982
- Sulfated bile acids in serum, bile, and urine of cirrhotic patients before and after portacaval anastomosisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1981
- Determination of urinary cholic and chenodeoxycholic acid conjugates with radioimmunoassayScandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 1980
- Sulphated and unsulphated bile acids in serum, bile, and urine of patients with cholestasis.Gut, 1976
- Bile Salt Sulphates in CholestasisEuropean Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1974