SIGNAL DETECTION AND MATCHING: ANALYZING CHOICE ON CONCURRENT VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULES
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 39 (1) , 107-127
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1983.39-107
Abstract
Pigeons' pecks on a red key and a green key were followed by access to grain according to pairs of concurrent independent variable-interval schedules in a combined signal detection/matching law paradigm. Pecks on the red key were reinforced by the richer variable-interval schedule if a short-duration tone had been presented; pecks on the green key were reinforced by the richer variable-interval schedule if a long-duration tone had been presented. Pecks on the green key given a short-duration tone, or on the red key given a long-duration tone, were reinforced by the leaner variable-interval schedule. The data were analyzed according to both signal detection's and the matching law's separate measures of, first, the discrimination of the choices and, second, the bias to make one response or another. Increasing the difficulty of the tone-duration discrimination decreased both methods' measures of the discrimination of the choices and did not change both methods' measures of the bias to make one response or another. Changing the leaner variable-interval schedule so that it approached the richer variable-interval schedule decreased signal detection's measure of discrimination but left its measure of response bias and the matching law measures unchanged. Data collected only until a subject's first changeover response following presentation of a long or a short tone showed higher values for both methods' measures of discrimination, no change in signal detection's measure of response bias, and lower values for the matching law's measure of response bias. Relationships between the matching law's and signal detection's methods of analyzing choice are discussed. It is concluded that a signal detection analysis is more efficient for examining changes in the difficulty of a discrimination, whereas a matching law analysis is more effective for examining the effects of changes in relative rein forcer frequency.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE ROLE OF DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULI IN CONCURRENT PERFORMANCESJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981
- REINFORCEMENT FOR ERRORS IN A SIGNAL‐DETECTION PROCEDUREJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1980
- MATCHING, UNDERMATCHING, AND OVERMATCHING IN STUDIES OF CHOICEJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1979
- THE RELATION BETWEEN THE GENERALIZED MATCHING LAW AND SIGNAL‐DETECTION THEORYJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978
- ON TWO TYPES OF DEVIATION FROM THE MATCHING LAW: BIAS AND UNDERMATCHING1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- DURATION DISCRIMINATION: EFFECTS OF PROBABILITY OF STIMULUS PRESENTATIONJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- DETECTION OF INCREMENTS IN NOISE INTENSITY BY MONKEYS1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972
- Vibrotactile vigilance: The effects of costs and values on signalsPerception & Psychophysics, 1969
- Auditory vigilance: The effects of costs and values on signalsAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1968
- A PROGRESSION FOR GENERATING VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962