Reply to Penack et al. and Wu
Open Access
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 39 (9) , 1402-1403
- https://doi.org/10.1086/425140
Abstract
Sir—In their letter, Penack et al. [1] question the reliability of the association between false-positive galactomannan (GM) antigenemia results obtained with use of the Platelia Aspergillus ELISA (Bio-Rad) and piperacillin-tazobactam treatment. To date, outbreaks of false-positive results during surveillance of GM antigenemia have been reported by 3 European centers caring for patients with hematological abnormalities (2 centers in France [2, 3] and 1 in Italy [3]). In France, moreover, several other centers experienced the same phenomenon starting in May 2003 and alerted the Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé, which is the French health products safety agency.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Platelia Aspergillus Assay and Potential Cross-ReactionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Treatment with Piperacillin‐Tazobactam and False‐PositiveAspergillusGalactomannan Antigen Test Results for Patients with Hematological MalignanciesClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- False‐Positive Galactomannan PlateliaAspergillusTest Results for Patients Receiving Piperacillin‐TazobactamClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- False Positive Test for Aspergillus Antigenemia Related to Concomitant Administration of Piperacillin and TazobactamNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Detection of Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in foods and antibioticsMycoses, 1997