Cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal population-based fragile X carrier screening
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 192 (6) , 1905-1912
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.052
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variation in the decision to terminate pregnancy in the setting of fetal aneuploidyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Relationship of deficits of FMR1 gene specific protein with physical phenotype of fragile X males and females in pedigrees: A new perspectiveAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2002
- Nuchal translucency and first trimester biochemical markers for down syndrome screening: A cost-effectiveness analysisAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2002
- A Decade of Molecular Studies of Fragile X SyndromeAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2002
- Fragile-X Carrier Screening and the Prevalence of Premutation and Full-Mutation Carriers in IsraelAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- Technical Standards and Guidelines for Fragile X: The First of a Series of Disease-Specific Supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical GeneticsGenetics in Medicine, 2001
- An assessment of screening strategies for fragile X syndrome in the UKHealth Technology Assessment, 2001
- Explorative Study of Costs, Effects and Savings of Screening for Female Fragile X Premutation and Full Mutation Carriers in the General PopulationPublic Health Genomics, 1998
- Fragile X syndrome and deletions in FMR1: New case and review of the literatureAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1997
- Cognitive functioning and information processing of adult mentally retarded men with fragile‐X syndromeAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1994