Randomized controlled study of colloid preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section †
Open Access
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Anaesthesia
- Vol. 87 (5) , 772-774
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.5.772
Abstract
We randomized women having elective Caesarean section to receive either no preload (control group, n=33) or 4% gelatin solution (Gelofusine) 15 ml kg–1 (colloid group, n=35) i.v. before spinal anaesthesia. Intravenous metaraminol was titrated at 0.25–0.75 mg min–1 to maintain systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in the target range 90–100% of baseline after the spinal injection. The control group required more vasopressor in the first 10 min [median 1.7 (range 0–2.9) mg vs 1.4 (0–2.8), P=0.02] at a greater maximum infusion rate [0.5 (0–0.75) vs 0.25 (0–0.5) mg min–1, P=0.0005] and had a lower minimum SAP [90 (51–109) vs 101 (75–127) mm Hg, P=0.006] than the colloid group. Nausea was less frequent in the colloid group (6 vs 24%) but neonatal outcome was similar in the two groups. Colloid preload improved haemodynamic stability but did not affect neonatal outcome when arterial pressure was maintained with an infusion of metaraminol during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87: 772–4Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metaraminol Infusion for Maintenance of Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effect of a Crystalloid BolusAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Comparison of Metaraminol and Ephedrine Infusions for Maintaining Arterial Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 2001
- L’hypotension pendant la césarienne sous rachianesthésie: devons-nous utiliser des colloïdes?Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2000
- Effects of Crystalloid and Colloid Preload on Blood Volume in the Parturient Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 1999
- Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean sectionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- Repeated measurements and multiple comparisons in cardiovascular researchCardiovascular Research, 1994