Relationship Between Refractive Error and Visual Acuity in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
- Vol. 105 (1) , 86-92
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1987.01060010092038
Abstract
• As part of the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) study, we examined the relationship between postoperative refractive error and visual acuity without correction. We included 394 eyes (one eye per patient) with refractive errors ranging from −3.00 to +3.00 diopters one year after radial keratotomy. Within each 1-D range of the spherical equivalent of the refractive error, the visual acuity spanned five to ten Snellen lines. For visual acuities of 20/16 to 20/ 50, the refractive error spanned 3 to 5 D. Additionally, operated eyes had a better average uncorrected visual acuity than unoperated eyes with a similar refractive error. Within the narrow range of refraction between −2.00 and −2.50 D, the mean uncorrected visual acuity was 20/ 125 for 56 unoperated eyes and 20/63 for 29 operated eyes, a difference of three Snellen lines.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standardized Illumination for Visual Acuity Testing in Clinical ResearchAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1982
- Quantification of the pinhole effectSurvey of Ophthalmology, 1977
- New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter ChartsOptometry and Vision Science, 1976
- Unaided Visual Acuities Correlated with Refractive ErrorsAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1946
- Relationship Between Visual Acuity and Refractive Error in MyopiaAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1945
- RELATION OF VISUAL ACUITY TO MYOPIAArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1945