Elective induction and stimulation of labor and the health of the infant.
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 68 (9) , 872-877
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.68.9.872
Abstract
This study examines a large heterogeneous sample to determine whether elective induction and stimulation of labor have a beneficial or deleterious effect on the health of the infant. Previous studies have reached contradictory results, partly because of the small sample sizes employed. This study uses a multiple regression analysis of New York City birth certificate data from 1968. We find a small, but significant, negative effect on the newborn of both elective induction of labor and elective stimulation of labor. When hospital care context is allowed to vary, much larger negative effects were found within municipal hospitals and to a lesser extent on service wards of voluntary hospitals. Although 1968 findings cannot be applied to 1978, the implications are clear.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of Births: Implications for the Incidence of Elective InductionMedical Care, 1976
- OBSTETRIC DELIVERY TODAY: For Better or for Worse?The Lancet, 1976
- Selective induction of labour.BMJ, 1975
- Relationship of Apgar Scores and Bayley Mental and Motor ScoresChild Development, 1975
- Letter: Induction of labour and perinatal mortality.BMJ, 1975
- SELECTIVE PLANNED INDUCTION IN CONDITIONS OF CIVIL STRIFEThe Lancet, 1975
- Dangers of Oxytocin-induced Labour to FetusesBMJ, 1974
- Intravenous prostaglandin F2α and amniotomy for the elective induction of labor at termjpme, 1973
- The Apgar Score as an Index of Infant MorbidityDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1966
- THE EFFECT OF PAIN RELIEF FOR LABOR AND DELIVERY ON THE FETUS AND NEWBORNAnesthesiology, 1960