Question Design, Response Set and the Measurement of Left/Right Thinking in Survey Research
- 1 March 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Canadian Journal Of Political Science-Revue Canadienne De Science Politique
- Vol. 16 (1) , 135-144
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423900028043
Abstract
This note considers the possibility that the format of the interview schedules in the 1965 and 1968 national election surveys may have influenced respondents' ratings of the major political parties on the seven-point left-wing/right-wing scale. It argues that the use of 12 additional scales, defined by more widely understood adjectives such as good/bad and powerful/weak, reduced the willingness of respondents to admit their ignorance and increased their use of the midpoint on this scale. The instructions in 1968 also urged respondents to use the scales even if they were unsure of their meanings. Some idea of the magnitude of these effects is provided by the 1979 survey in which only the left/right scale was employed. Eliminating these artifacts in 1979 contributed to a picture of a party system that was more clearly differentiated and polarized along the left/right continuum.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social stratification, voting behaviour, and the images of Canadian federal political parties*Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 1979
- Mass‐elite linkages and class issues in Canada*Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 1976
- Semantic Differential Measures of British Party ImagesBritish Journal of Political Science, 1976
- Political Change in BritainPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- In Search of the Stable Elements of the Left-Right LandscapeComparative Politics, 1972
- Note On the Use of the Left-Right DimensionComparative Political Studies, 1970
- Four semantic rating scales compared.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1960