Selective Attention to Signs of Success: Social Dominance and Early Stage Interpersonal Perception
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 34 (4) , 488-501
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207311910
Abstract
Results from two experiments suggest that observers selectively attend to male, but not female, targets displaying signs of social dominance. Participants overestimated the frequency of dominant men in rapidly presented stimulus arrays (Study 1) and visually fixated on dominant men in an eyetracking experiment (Study 2). When viewing female targets, participants attended to signs of physical attractiveness rather than social dominance. Findings fit with evolutionary models of mating, which imply that dominance and physical attractiveness sometimes tend to be prioritized preferentially in judgments of men versus women, respectively. Findings suggest that sex differences in human mating are observed not only at the level of overt mating preferences and choices but also at early stages of interpersonal perception. This research demonstrates the utility of examining early-in-the-stream social cognition through the functionalist lens of adaptationist thinking.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007
- TARGET ARTICLE: Evolutionary Foundations of Cultural Variation: Evoked Culture and Mate PreferencesPsychological Inquiry, 2006
- Concentrating on Beauty: Sexual Selection and Sociospatial MemoryPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2005
- Different Emotional Reactions to Different Groups: A Sociofunctional Threat-Based Approach to "Prejudice".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005
- Gender differences in rival characteristics that evoke jealousy in response to emotional versus sexual infidelityPersonal Relationships, 2004
- Evolutionary Psychology From a Developmental Systems Perspective: Comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003).Psychological Bulletin, 2003
- The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles.American Psychologist, 1999
- Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive scienceCognition, 1994
- Sexual Strategies Theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating.Psychological Review, 1993
- Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 culturesBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 1989