Evaluating decision aids – where next?
- 29 April 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 7 (2) , 98-103
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00258.x
Abstract
Decision aids have been developed to help patients become involved in decision-making about their individual health care. During the evaluation of a particular decision aid in maternity care--a set of 10 'Informed Choice' leaflets--we considered the lessons learnt for evaluation of decision aids in the future. Decision aids have been tested mainly in explanatory trials and have been found to be effective. We argue that existing decision aids should be subjected to more pragmatic trials to test their effectiveness in the real world. The small amount of evidence on their use in the real world shows that they face challenges, resulting in poor implementation. Therefore, we propose that implementation strategies are developed which take heed of the findings of research on getting evidence into practice, and in particular address structural barriers such as the lack of time available to health professionals. We recommend that these 'decision aid implementation packages' are developed in conjunction with both health professionals and patients, and identify and address potential barriers to both the delivery of patient involvement in decision-making, and the use of decision aids, in the real world. These 'packages' can then be submitted to pragmatic evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practice based, longitudinal, qualitative interview study of computerised evidence based guidelines in primary careBMJ, 2003
- Self help smoking cessation in pregnancy: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2002
- Effect of computerised evidence based guidelines on management of asthma and angina in adults in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2002
- Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity careBMJ, 2002
- Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic reviewJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2001
- Implementing shared decision‐making in routine practice: barriers and opportunitiesHealth Expectations, 2000
- Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.1999
- Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational studyBMJ, 1998
- Uptake and acceptability of antenatal HIV testing: randomised controlled trial of different methods of offering the testBMJ, 1998
- Evidence-Informed Patient Choice: Practical Issues of Involving Patients in Decisions About Health Care TechnologiesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1998