Conflict, War, and Redistribution
- 1 December 1985
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Political Science Review
- Vol. 79 (4) , 943-957
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1956242
Abstract
This article analyzes the circumstances under which conflict leads to the outbreak of war using a formal model which incorporates both the redistribution of resources as an alternative to war and imperfect information. Countries act as rational agents concerned with both consumption and the public bad of a war. In the first period both countries can either consume or build arms, whereas in the second period there can be either the threat or the use of force to reallocate resources. If both countries are fully informed, then there will be no war but rather a voluntary redistribution of resources. In a situation of asymmetric information, however, in which one country is fully informed and the other is not, a war can occur if the uninformed country uses a separating equilibrium strategy, precommitting itself to a positive probability of war in order to prevent bluffing by the informed country.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Arms Races Lead to the Outbreak of War?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1984
- A Question of Loyalty. By Paul M. Sniderman. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981. Pp. 196. $18.95, cloth; $6.95, paper.)American Political Science Review, 1983
- Armaments and Escalation: Two Competing HypothesesInternational Studies Quarterly, 1982
- Arms Race Instability and WarJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1980
- The Geometry of the Arms RaceInternational Studies Quarterly, 1979
- Arms Races and EscalationJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1979
- A New Approach to the Nash Bargaining ProblemEconometrica, 1977
- Do Arms Races Lead to War?Journal of Peace Research, 1975
- Strategic Considerations in the Richardson Model of Arms RacesJournal of Political Economy, 1975
- A Dynamic Model of an Armaments RaceInternational Economic Review, 1972