Roles of Gravitational Cues and Efference Copy Signals in the Rotational Updating of Memory Saccades
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 94 (1) , 468-478
- https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00700.2004
Abstract
Primates are able to localize a briefly flashed target despite intervening movements of the eyes, head, or body. This ability, often referred to as updating, requires extraretinal signals related to the intervening movement. With active roll rotations of the head from an upright position it has been shown that the updating mechanism is 3-dimensional, robust, and geometrically sophisticated. Here we examine whether such a rotational updating mechanism operates during passive motion both with and without inertial cues about head/body position in space. Subjects were rotated from either an upright or supine position, about a nasal–occipital axis, briefly shown a world-fixed target, rotated back to their original position, and then asked to saccade to the remembered target location. Using this paradigm, we tested subjects' abilities to update from various tilt angles (0, ±30, ±45, ±90°), to 8 target directions and 2 target eccentricities. In the upright condition, subjects accurately updated the remembered locations from all tilt angles independent of target direction or eccentricity. Slopes of directional errors versus tilt angle ranged from −0.011 to 0.15, and were significantly different from a slope of 1 (no compensation for head-in-space roll) and a slope of 0.9 (no compensation for eye-in-space roll). Because the eyes, head, and body were fixed throughout these passive movements, subjects could not use efference copies or neck proprioceptive cues to assess the amount of tilt, suggesting that vestibular signals and/or body proprioceptive cues suffice for updating. In the supine condition, where gravitational signals could not contribute, slopes ranged from 0.60 to 0.82, indicating poor updating performance. Thus information specifying the body's orientation relative to gravity is critical for maintaining spatial constancy and for distinguishing body-fixed versus world-fixed reference frames.Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cortico‐cortical connections and cytoarchitectonics of the primate vestibular cortex: A study in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus)Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1992
- Primate supplementary eye field. II. Comparative aspects of connections with the thalamus, corpus striatum, and related forebrain nucleiJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1991
- Primate supplementary eye field: I. Comparative aspects of mesencephalic and pontine connectionsJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1990
- Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys II. cortical connectionsJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1987
- Frontal eye field as defined by intracortical microstimulation in squirrel monkeys, owl monkeys, and macaque monkeys: I. Subcortical connectionsJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1986
- Anatomical connections of the nucleus prepositus of the catJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1985
- Diencephalic projections from the pontine reticular formation: Autoradiographic studies in the catBrain Research, 1982
- Anatomical evidence of a third ascending vestibular pathway involving the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus and the intralaminar nuclei of the catBrain Research, 1979
- Relations between thalamic and corticofrontal sites of oculomotor control in the catBrain Research, 1973
- Cortical area 8 and its thalamic projection inMacaca mulattaJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1963