On the Value of Households' Recycling Efforts
Preprint
- 1 March 2002
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
Do households' recycling efforts represent a social cost, which should be taken into account in cost-benefit analyses of alternative waste treatment systems.' Some argue that it should not, since recycling efforts are to a large extent voluntary. We demonstrate that if the government can indirectly increase voluntary recycling efforts through appeals to the public or through similar means, then the use of these means does impose a cost on households. This cost can be higher or lower than the environmental gain resulting from the increased recycling. Norwegian data indicates a willingness to pay to let others take over the individual's sorting of household waste corresponding to a cost of about USD 87 per tonne, which is significant compared to the total treatment costs.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computable General Equilibrium Assessments of Fiscal Sustainability in NorwayPublished by Elsevier ,2013
- Means‐Testing the Child BenefitReview of Income and Wealth, 2004
- Social Norms and Private Provision of Public GoodsJournal of Public Economic Theory, 2004
- An economic model of moral motivationJournal of Public Economics, 2003
- Oil Exploration under Climate TreatiesJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002
- A behavioral two‐sex marriage modelMathematical Population Studies, 2001
- Economics and Identity*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research resultsThe Journal of Socio-Economics, 1995
- Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow GivingThe Economic Journal, 1990
- Crime and Punishment: An Economic ApproachJournal of Political Economy, 1968