What Is the Best Method of Surgical Training?
Open Access
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 133 (8) , 900-905
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.8.900
Abstract
STRENGTHENING pressures from societal, economic, and personal influences are bringing about increasing discussion concerning ways in which surgical training should evolve.1-5 As the number of fellowships or specialty training programs increases, these same influences have led to the consideration of shortened surgical training by instituting a system of "short tracking" into specific fields.1,6-15 The reason for a short tracking system is that overall training time is decreased. Several proposed systems tend to include 1 to 3 years of a clinical and basic research commitment followed by a final 2 to 3 years of subspecialty residency. This study characterizes the career choices and developments made by leading senior surgeons in this country and explores whether a short tracking system would have hindered their career decisions.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- General surgery in evolution: Technology and competenceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- U.S. health care reform: Will it change postgraduate surgical education?World Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Restoration, Not Preservation, of General Surgery ResidencyArchives of Surgery, 1993
- Is fellowship training in alimentary tract surgery necessary?The American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Responsibilities of General Surgery: Training for the FutureArchives of Surgery, 1990