Minimal breaches of confidentiality in health care research: a Canadian perspective.
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Medical Ethics
- Vol. 20 (3) , 165-168
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.3.165
Abstract
In a large proportion of health care research based on the retrospective review of records, minimal breach of patient confidentiality appears to be inevitable. This occurs at initial identification of and access to the chart, selected on the basis of the condition under investigation, and while individual identifiability can be blocked at subsequent stages, at this point it does occur. Prospective individual consent is impractical because often neither the desirability nor the specific subject of the research is known at the time of making the record, and retrospective patient tracing to obtain it is often impossible. I argue that the benefit of the research outweighs the minimal breach of confidentiality, and that in my own jurisdiction, this appears to be envisaged and accepted in Canadian law.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ethics and legality of HIV prevalence studies: a contrary view .1992
- Individual and community rights in anonymous unlinked HIV seroprevalence research: a response to Dr. Emson.1992
- Anonymous HIV testingThe Lancet, 1990
- Confidentiality: a modified value.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1988
- Medical confidentiality: an intransigent and absolute obligation.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1986