Community Mobilization Against Urban Crime
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Urban Affairs Quarterly
- Vol. 30 (3) , 407-431
- https://doi.org/10.1177/107808749503000305
Abstract
Periodically, crime becomes a prominent issue in the politics of cities. In the past, politicians, police officials, and the media elevated crime to public and political agenda status for their own purposes. Increasingly, however, grassroots activists are raising crime as an issue and are organizing to cope with it in their communities. The type and posture of these organizations differ significantly. The postures that anticrime activists adopt are largely decided by their perspectives toward (1) the legitimacy of governmental authority and (2) their sense of efficacy. These guiding orientations lead activists to fall into four basic categories that are labeled Negotiational, Adversarial, Delegational, and Alienated.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coproduction of Law Enforcement ServicesUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1992
- Fear and Reactions to CrimeUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1987
- Soaking Poking, and Just Wallowing in ItPs, 1986
- Beyond the Politics of InterestPublished by Springer Nature ,1985
- Neighborhood PoliticsPublished by Harvard University Press ,1983
- Front-Page News and Real-World Cues: A New Look at Agenda-Setting by the MediaAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1980
- Agenda Building as a Comparative Political ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1976
- Newspaper Agendas and Political ElitesJournalism Quarterly, 1975
- The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass MediaPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1972
- An Exchange Theory of Interest GroupsMidwest Journal of Political Science, 1969