Shortcomings of Physical Examination and Impedance Plethysmography in the Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis
- 1 March 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Angiology
- Vol. 38 (3) , 232-235
- https://doi.org/10.1177/000331978703800305
Abstract
Accuracy in the diagnosis of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) by physical examination and impedance plethysmography (IPG) is reviewed. Physical examination proved unreliable in distinguishing patients with and without acute disease. Swelling in the leg was, however, more prevalent in patients with DVT. The sensitivity and specificity of IPG were less than those reported by other groups. Venography remains the most reliable diagnostic procedure in our institution.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS1985
- Suspected Deep Vein ThrombosisArchives of Surgery, 1982
- Impedance plethysmography: the relationship between venous filling and sensitivity and specificity for proximal vein thrombosis.Circulation, 1978
- VASCULAR-LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF CLINICALLY SUSPECTED ACUTE DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSISThe Lancet, 1978
- Diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis by measurement of electrical impedanceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1970
- Problems of Acute Deep Venous ThrombosisAngiology, 1969
- An Evaluation of Clinical Signs in the Diagnosis of Venous ThrombosisArchives of Surgery, 1962