The news paradigm and the ideology of objectivity: A socialist at the wall street journal
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Critical Studies in Mass Communication
- Vol. 7 (4) , 390-409
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039009360187
Abstract
This study examines the news paradigm as an occupational ideology whose major feature is the principle of objectivity, and the larger hegemonic function of that paradigm. An anomalous case is analyzed to illustrate paradigmatic repair: A. Kent MacDougall caused a controversy in the journalistic community and threatened the paradigmatic norm of objectivity when he revealed that he had been a radical socialist during his ten years as a reporter for The Wall Street Journal. Three types of repair are examined: (a) disengaging and distancing the threatening values from the reporter's work, (b) reasserting the ability of journalistic routines to prevent threatening values from “distorting” the news, and (c) marginalizing the man and his message, making both appear ineffective.This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Boring From Within the Bourgeois Press, Part IIMonthly Review, 1988
- Boring From Within the Bourgeois Press, Part IMonthly Review, 1988
- Critical studies: From the theory of ideology to power/knowledgeCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1988
- Toward a New Political NarrativeJournal of Communication, 1985
- Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post‐structuralist debatesCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1985
- Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studiesCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1984
- Marxist approaches to media studies: The British experienceCritical Studies in Mass Communication, 1984
- The Position of the Press in the U. S. Power StructureSocial Problems, 1982
- Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of ObjectivityAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1972
- Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional AnalysisSocial Forces, 1955