Midair Collisions: The Accidents, the Systems, and the Realpolitik
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Vol. 22 (5) , 521-533
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088002200502
Abstract
In 1977, two jumbo jets collided on the runway at Tenerife, Canary Islands. A year later, there were two spectacular midair collisions, one at Memphis and, shortly after, one at San Diego. These accidents have called into question the adequacy of air traffic control systems and have revealed numerous design problems that can lead to human error. Following the San Diego collision in September, 1978, involving an air carrier Boeing 727 and a Cessna /72, there was a hue and cry to "do something." Among the many proposed solutions were tighter control on visual flight rules aircraft and expansion of the positive control airspace. This resulted in a political battle involving general aviation, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Congress. This paper examines collisions from a human factors perspective, seeing them as system-induced errors, resulting from an air traffic control system that emphasizes airspace allocation and political compromise, rather than dealing directly with the various problems facing controllers and pilots operating within the National Airspace System.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cockpit Displayed Traffic Information and Distributed Management in Air Traffic ControlHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1980
- Evaluation of the Potential Format and Content of a Cockpit Display of Traffic InformationHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1980
- StormThe Hudson Review, 1979
- Controlled Flight into Terrain Accidents: System-Induced ErrorsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1977