Hearing Thresholds with Direct Bone Conduction Versus Conventional Bone Conduction
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Audiology
- Vol. 13 (1) , 3-13
- https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398409076252
Abstract
Some patients who need hearing aids are unable to use an aid which transmits the sound via the external ear canal, but have to use a bone-conduction hearing aid. The pressure needed to apply the transducer often gives the patient discomfort, and the attenuating effect of the skin gives poor electroacoustical function of the aid. A permanent skin penetration has made it possible to develop a boneanchored hearing aid with all components in one housing. Ten patients have been equipped with such an aid. This paper deals with a comparative hearing threshold measurement on 10 patients. Békésy audiometry was performed and a conventional Oticon (A-type) transducer was used. In the frequency range 600 to 6000 Hz, there was a lowering of 10–20 dB in thresholds when skin penetration was performed. This lowering in thresholds means lower transducer distortion, lower electrical gain, and lower power consumption to produce a given sensation level.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrocochleography with Bone-Conducted Stimulation: A Comparative Study of Different Methods of StimulationActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1983
- Bone-Conducted Stimulation in ElectrocochleographyActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1977
- Mechanical impedance of human headbones (forehead and mastoid portion of the temporal bone) measured under ISO/IEC conditionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976
- Reconstruction of the Defective MandibleScandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1975
- Response of the Human Skull to Mechanical VibrationsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1956
- A New AudiometerActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1947