Lexical characteristics of near‐native second‐language learners of Swedish
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
- Vol. 9 (1-2) , 67-84
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1988.9994320
Abstract
Various aspects of the vocabulary of near‐native second‐language learners of Swedish were analysed and compared to that of matched native Swedish speakers. Quantitative measures of lexical usage focussed upon comprised lexical density, lexical variation and lexical sophistication. Further, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of lexical errors was carried out. Data were elicited from 36 students attending the second‐year course of the Swedish gymnasieskola (senior high school level). The population comprised 24 bilingual students, among whom 12 had Finnish and 12 had Spanish as their first language, and 12 monolingual Swedish speakers. Both oral and written data were collected from each student, and, from the bilingual students, data were obtained from both their languages. The oral data consisted of retellings of four narratives, while the written data comprised summary reviews of Charlie Chaplin's silent film, Modem Times. Only the Swedish data are considered in this paper. The results are discussed in relation to the current discussion of differing proficiency levels required for everyday context‐embedded, cognitively un‐demand‐ing communication as opposed to literate language use (cf. Cummins, 1983). In addition, the results from the lexical error analysis are related to the concept of fossilisation (Selinker, 1972).Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English: Resolving the Contradictory FindingsLanguage, 1986
- Second Language AcquisitionPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1986
- Semilingualism: A Half-Baked Theory of Communicative CompetenceApplied Linguistics, 1986
- IS THERE A STRUCTURAL FOREIGN ACCENT? A COMPARISON OF SYNTACTIC AND PHONOLOGICAL ERRORS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITIONLanguage Learning, 1984
- Semilingualism and Language DeficitApplied Linguistics, 1983
- INTERLANGUAGEInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1972