Light intensity and phototaxis in the house fly: Photonegativity in a yellow-eyed mutant
- 1 March 1977
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavior Genetics
- Vol. 7 (2) , 129-137
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01066001
Abstract
Y-tube tests of phototactic behavior of house flies (Musca domestica L.) involving wild-type, yellow-eyed, and hybrid individuals were conducted under low (8 ft-candles, 86.1 lux) and high (1600 ft-candles, 17,222.8 lux) light intensities. The Y-tube design utilized either a clear or a dark stem leading to the branches where the photochoice was made. No significant differences were found in the responses of the wild-type and hybrid lines to either light intensity or Y-tube design. Significant differences were recorded for the yellow-eyed individuals only under high light intensities, whereas their behavior under low light conditions was indistinguishable from that of the wild phenotypes. Yellow-eyed flies showed a 68.6% photopositive response when tested in dark-stemmed Y-tubes under 1600 ft-candles intensity as compared to the 86.0% and 83.3% photopositive responses of the wild and hybrid lines, respectively. However, the yellow-eyed flies tested in the clear-stemmed Y-tubes under 1600 ft-candles showed only a 28.7% photopositive response—a clear reversal toward photonegativity. Light-dark adaptation of the highly sensitive yellow-pigmented eye while in the stem of the Y-tube is responsible for this switch toward photonegative behavior.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic and light intensity effects on the activity and emigratory behavior of the house fly,Musca domestica (L.)Behavior Genetics, 1977
- The use of behavioral mutants in biological controlBehavior Genetics, 1972
- Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila . IIProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1969
- Heritability of Phototactic and Geotactic Responses in Drosophila pseudoobscuraThe American Naturalist, 1969
- Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila . IProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1967
- Optomotor response studies of insect visionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1965
- GENETIC INFLUENCE ON PHOTOTAXIS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTERThe Biological Bulletin, 1964
- Photoreceptor structures. II. Drosophila melanogasterJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1957
- The role of the eye‐pigments of Drosophila melanogaster in photic orientationJournal of Experimental Zoology, 1952
- The Reactions of the Pomace Fly (Drosophila ampelophila Loew) to Light, Gravity, and Mechanical StimulationThe American Naturalist, 1905