Political Movements and State Authority in Liberal Democracies
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 42 (2) , 299-313
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010467
Abstract
Political movements are an increasingly common form of mass political mobilization, and the legitimacy and authority of democratic states depends to a growing extent on the relationship between movements and states. Existing case studies of political movements neglect that relationship in favor of issues of mobilization, organization, and societal impact. These studies can nonetheless be used to show that political movements employ a mixture of confrontation and collaboration in their relationship to the state. More centralized states, which offer fewer institutional channels for movement influence, face more confrontational movements. However, political movements in all democratic settings use confrontation primarily as a strategic device to enhance their leverage in negotiations with state authorities. Movements are not a challenge to state authority so much as they are a force for change within democratic society.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mobilizing for PeacePublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1988
- National Politics and Collective Action: Recent Theory and Research in Western Europe and the United StatesAnnual Review of Sociology, 1988
- Japanese Prefectures and PolicymakingPublished by JSTOR ,1986
- Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four DemocraciesBritish Journal of Political Science, 1986
- The Politics of Regional Policy in JapanPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1983
- Relative Deprivation and Social Movements: A Critical Look at Twenty Years of Theory and ResearchThe Sociological Quarterly, 1982
- Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial TheoryAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1977
- Protest as a Political ResourceAmerican Political Science Review, 1968