Network Architectures and Circuit Function: Testing Alternative Hypotheses in Multifunctional Networks
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Brain, Behavior and Evolution
- Vol. 55 (5) , 248-255
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000006659
Abstract
Understanding how species-typical movement patterns are organized in the nervous system is a central question in neurobiology. The current explanations involve ‘alphabet’ models in which an individual neuron may participate in the circuit for several behaviors but each behavior is specified by a specific neural circuit. However, not all of the well-studied model systems fit the ‘alphabet’ model. The ‘equation’ model provides an alternative possibility, whereby a system of parallel motor neurons, each with a unique (but overlapping) field of innervation, can account for the production of stereotyped behavior patterns by variable circuits. That is, it is possible for such patterns to arise as emergent properties of a generalized neural network in the absence of feedback, a simple version of a ‘self-organizing’ behavioral system. Comparison of systems of identified neurons suggest that the ‘alphabet’ model may account for most observations where CPGs act to organize motor patterns. Other well-known model systems, involving architectures corresponding to feed-forward neural networks with a hidden layer, may organize patterned behavior in a manner consistent with the ‘equation’ model. Such architectures are found in the Mauthner and reticulospinal circuits, ‘escape’ locomotion in cockroachs, CNS control of Aplysia gill, and may also be important in the coordination of sensory information and motor systems in insect mushroom bodies and the vertebrate hippocampus. The hidden layer of such networks may serve as an ‘internal representation’ of the behavioral state and/or body position of the animal, allowing the animal to fine-tune oriented, or particularly context-sensitive, movements to the prevalent conditions. Experiments designed to distinguish between the two models in cases where they make mutually exclusive predictions provide an opportunity to elucidate the neural mechanisms by which behavior is organized in vivo and in vitro.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revisiting the Concept of Identifiable NeuronsBrain, Behavior and Evolution, 2000
- The Interneurons of the Abdominal Positioning System of the CrayfishBrain, Behavior and Evolution, 2000
- Identification of an abdominal ganglion neuron antagonizing L7-driven gill contraction in AplysiaJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1999
- Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networksNature, 1998
- Consistency of interneuronal group formation in response to stimulation of identified cellsJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1998
- Common Principles of Motor Control in Vertebrates and InvertebratesAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1993
- Construction of a pattern-generating circuit with neurons of different networksNature, 1991
- Reexamination of the gill withdrawal reflex of Aplysia californica cooper (Gastropoda; Opisthobranchia).Behavioral Neuroscience, 1988
- Oscillatory Neural NetworksAnnual Review of Physiology, 1985
- Neural Control of BehaviorAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 1978