Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 12 (9) , 1284-1299
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732302238251
Abstract
The authors describe a method of systematically reviewing research from different paradigms. They draw on the methods adapted, developed, and designed during a study concerned with the delivery of care across professional boundaries. Informed by the established method of systematic review, the authors undertook the review in distinct stages. They describe the methods developed for each stage and outline the difficulties encountered, the solutions devised, and the appraisal tools developed. Although many of the problems encountered were related to the critical assessment of qualitative research, the authors argue that the method of systematic review can be adapted for use with different data and across disciplines.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative research in systematic reviewsBMJ, 2001
- Review of the usefulness of contacting other experts when conducting a literature search for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1998
- Qualitative research and evidence based medicineBMJ, 1998
- Selecting and Appraising Studies for a Systematic ReviewAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals?Learned Publishing, 1997
- How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)BMJ, 1997
- Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- A review of recently published qualitative research in general practice. More methodological questions than answers?Family Practice, 1997
- Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articlesBMJ, 1994
- Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviewsBMJ, 1994