Simple and Fast Lateral Flow Test for Classification of Leprosy Patients and Identification of Contacts with High Risk of Developing Leprosy
Open Access
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 41 (5) , 1991-1995
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.5.1991-1995.2003
Abstract
The interruption of leprosy transmission is one of the main challenges for leprosy control programs since no consistent evidence exists that transmission has been reduced after the introduction of multidrug therapy. Sources of infection are primarily people with high loads of bacteria with or without clinical signs of leprosy. The availability of a simple test system for the detection of antibodies to phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) of Mycobacterium leprae to identify these individuals may be important in the prevention of transmission. We have developed a lateral flow assay, the ML Flow test, for the detection of antibodies to PGL-I which takes only 10 min to perform. An agreement of 91% was observed between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and our test; the agreement beyond chance (kappa value) was 0.77. We evaluated the use of whole blood by comparing 539 blood and serum samples from an area of high endemicity. The observed agreement was 85.9% (kappa = 0.70). Storage of the lateral flow test and the running buffer at 28°C for up to 1 year did not influence the results of the assay. The sensitivity of the ML Flow test in correctly classifying MB patients was 97.4%. The specificity of the ML Flow test, based on the results of the control group, was 90.2%. The ML Flow test is a fast and easy-to-perform method for the detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to PGL-I of M. leprae . It does not require any special equipment, and the highly stable reagents make the test robust and suitable for use in tropical countries.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dipstick assay to identify leprosy patients who have an increased risk of relapseTropical Medicine & International Health, 2001
- Use of ML dipstick as a tool to classify leprosy patients.2000
- Patient contact is the major determinant in incident leprosy: implications for future control.1999
- Sensitivity and specificity of methods of classification of leprosy without use of skin-smear examination.1998
- The contribution of serological tests to leprosy control.1996
- Evaluation ofMycobacterium lepraeantigens in the monitoring of a dapsone-based chemotherapy of previously untreated lepromatous patients in Cebu, PhilippinesLeprosy Review, 1989
- USE OF ANTI-MYCOBACTERIUM-LEPRAE PHENOLIC GLYCOLIPID-I ANTIBODY DETECTION FOR EARLY DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF LEPROSY1988
- Comparison of Synthetic Antigens for Detecting Antibodies to Phenolic Glycolipid I in Patients with Leprosy and Their Household ContactsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- The allyl group for protection in carbohydrate chemistry. 17. Synthesis of propyl O-(3,6-di-O-methyl-β-D-glucopyranosyl)- (1→4)-O-(2,3-di-O-methyl-α-L-rhamnopyranosyl)-(1 → 2)-3-O-methyl-α-L-rhamnopyranoside: the oligosaccharide portion of the major serologically active glycolipid from Mycobacterium lepraeChemistry and Physics of Lipids, 1985
- Use of an Artificial Antigen Containing the 3,6-di-O-methyl- -D-glucopyranosyl Epitope for the Serodiagnosis of LeprosyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1984