EVOLUTIONARY IMPLICATIONS OF DNA DIVERGENCE IN THE DROSOPHILA OBSCURA GROUP
- 1 September 1990
- Vol. 44 (6) , 1656-1670
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03854.x
Abstract
Using DNA-DNA hybridization, we have determined the degree of single-copy DNA (scDNA) divergence among eight species of the Drosophila obscura group. These include Old World and New World species as well as members of two subgroups. Contrary to classical systematics, members of the affinis subgroup are more closely related to American members of the obscura subgroup than are Old World species. The Old World species are not a monophyletic group. The degree of scDNA divergence among species is not necessarily correlated with morphology, chromosomal divergence, or ability to form hybrids. A unique pattern of hybrid formation was found: species separated by a .DELTA.Tm of 6.5.degree. C can form hybrids whereas species separated by a .DELTA.Tm of 2.5.degree. C cannot. As with other groups of Drosophila, the obscura group has discrete parts of the genome evolving at very different rates. The slow evolving fraction of the nuclear genome is evolving at about the same rate as mitochondrial DNA. The additional scDNA divergence accompanying the step from partial reproductive isolation (between North American pseudoobscura and the isolated Bogota, [COLOMBIA] population) to full isolation is very small. The resolution of the technique was challenged by five closely related taxa with a maximum .DELTA.Tm of 2.5.degree. C separating them; the taxa were unambiguously resolved and the "correct" phylogeny recovered. Finally, there is some indication that scDNA in the obscura group may be evolving considerably slower than in the melanogaster subgroup.Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (BSR‐8806148)
- National Institutes of Health (GM 36648)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- The TEACL method of DNA-DNA hybridization: Technical considerationsJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1990
- Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation in DrosophilaGenome, 1989
- Evolutionary genetics of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. I. Phylogenetic relationships based on matings, hybrids and proteins.The Japanese Journal of Genetics, 1987
- Evolution of the obscura group drosophila species. II. Phylogeny of ten species based on electrophoretic dataHeredity, 1984
- Genetic Distance and Evolutionary Relationships in the Drosophila obscura GroupEvolution, 1983
- Evolutionary distances in hawaiian drosophila measured by DNA reassociationJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1981
- Frog Perspective on the Morphological Difference Between Humans and ChimpanzeesScience, 1978
- The Use of Isoenzymes in Tracing Evolution and in Classifying DrosophilidaeZoologica Scripta, 1976
- Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila . IProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1967
- Further data onDrosophila miranda and its hybrids withDrosophila pseudoobscuraJournal of Genetics, 1937