ERB's PALSY
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 95 (6, Part 1) , 941-942
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00810-3
Abstract
In the past, obstetric textbooks have stated (without evidence) that Erb’s palsy is caused by the birth attendant. The mechanism cited is stated to be the application of excessive lateral traction placed on the fetal head and neck. Recent research findings refute this unproven theory. Findings include (1) only 50% of cases are associated with shoulder dystocia; (2) the 4.7-fold increase in the condition was associated with a precipitate second stage compared with one of normal length; and (3) the same injury rate with direct manipulation techniques (for resolving shoulder dystocia) was comparable to that of McRobert’s position and/or suprapubic pressure. The overwhelming evidence indicts the propulsive nature of the stretching of the involved nerves over which the birth attendant has no control.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Spontaneous vaginal delivery: A risk factor for Erb's palsy?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Brachial plexus palsy associated with cesarean section: An in utero injury?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- DiscussionPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1997
- The Green Bay cesarean section study IV. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates for the large fetusAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Brachial Plexus Palsy Involving the Posterior Shoulder at Spontaneous Vaginal DeliveryAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1995
- Brachial plexus palsy: An old problem revisitedAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992